On 13 June 2012 21:44, Michael Peel <michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:

> My understanding of this line of argument was that images would be displayed 
> where you would expect them to be displayed (e.g. the article on penis or 
> vagina would naturally include a picture of a penis or vagina),

I don't recall this being conceded. (The discussions of image filter
plans seemed to me to assume that images considered unsuitable would
indeed be filtered in such places.)

So who first brought the phrase into the discussion?

- d.

Wikimedia-l mailing list
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

Reply via email to