* Michael Peel wrote:
>My understanding of this line of argument was that images would be
>displayed where you would expect them to be displayed (e.g. the article
>on penis or vagina would naturally include a picture of a penis or
>vagina), but wouldn't be immediately displayed where you wouldn't expect
>them (e.g. if you want to find information on necklaces made of pearls).

Did anyone argue for displaying images where they would not expect them?
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[email protected] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

Reply via email to