"Does the Foundation have the will to protect volunteer editors from the deleterious effects of income inequality?" This is, I think, is the signal of where James is going with this. This is the recurrence of the argument from a few months ago of paying editors, something that I think virtually anyone who has thought about it would oppose. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? James Salsman
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Richard Symonds
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Thomas Dalton
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? James Salsman
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Birgitte_sb
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? James Salsman
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Thomas Dalton
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Michael Snow
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Quim Gil
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Sarah Stierch
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Nathan
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Thomas Dalton
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Quim Gil
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? James Salsman
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Michael Snow
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Richard Symonds
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? James Salsman
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Thomas Morton
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Gerard Meijssen
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? James Salsman
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] compromise? Thomas Morton