Dear Fae,

I find it contradictory to consider that anticipated election of the chair is 
good for WCA but that for the vice chair it would be bad, if we need to have 
elections before Milano we can have both in parallel.

Anyway I was,  and I'm still  oppose to anticipated election.  Since the 
beginning of the discussion about WCA bylaws , the question of "do we need a 
chair and a vice chair" hasn't been fixed, and I'm sorry to tell that provoking 
new election before fixing this point is just bad.


Jan-Bart in a previous mail made the good comment that we should stop 
discussing about membership and voting, but the question here is really about 
what is the WCA.
Several chapters ask for an Iberocoop model, it means that they don't want a 
chair and a vice chair. The people present in London can argue that at least 
some position should exist to assure that coordination is done, but the 7 
present in London cannot decide for 14 others.  By deciding to anticipate the 
election of the chair it's just what you have done.

In your answer you talk about WMF board asking directly or indirectly for your 
replacement. This argument has been read in the personal comment of board 
member, and all chapter are aware of that and will take it into account, or 
not, when the time will come. But we don't need your resignation now whereas 
the new election is already planned in just two month, the few week of 
difference will not affect the WCA. Also if you are personally disputed by 
people outside the chapter, the vice chair is at least equally disputed among 
the chapter, what's the most important?


Finally I will point that WCA is representing 21 chapters for now, and most of 
those chapters are really tired of discussion in english on meta, asking them 
to have a "campaign" and a vote online whereas we can have a live vote in 
Milano is just another way to say "we don't care of you".


WCA is needed, but is not needed tomorrow , it's needed when all chapter will 
participate and make it grow, and we won't have that unless we find the seed 
action that will make all chapter willing to support is growth, and sorry this 
is not this list 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Chapters_Association/Meetings/2013-07#Session_3:_Actions.2C_engagement
 that will change the actual dynamic.

I'm not a magician, I don't have a ready to use solution, but what I'm sure, is 
that the very first step should be an open discussion between chapters about 
what is the WCA is, and for that purpose I created this page, to build a survey 
among chapters: 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Chapters_Association/survey_march_2013

I invite all interested people to participate to the creation of this survey. 
In a second time the same type of survey should be open to the whole movement, 
but because the WCA is the CHAPTER ASSOCIATION, I think it's reasonable to 
first know what the first concerned people think.


Cheers

Charles
 


 

















___________________________________________________________
I use this email for mailing list only.

Charles ANDRES, Chairman
"Wikimedia CH" – Association for the advancement of free knowledge –
www.wikimedia.ch
Skype: charles.andres.wmch
IRC://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-ch

Le 20 févr. 2013 à 09:25, Fae <[email protected]> a écrit :

> On 20 February 2013 07:57, Charles Andrès <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Hello Ziko,
>> 
>> Because you want to hear:
>> 
>> 1)Their is no census within the chapter whether we still want a deputy chair 
>> position
> 
> It's better for us to focus on the actions we are taking for the next
> 3 months. We decided to defer discussion about changing roles and
> considering a board, or changing the titles we currently use. Any
> member of the Council is welcome to draft a resolution or discuss
> alternatives, but this will draw the oxygen away from being seen to
> make progress on solid outcomes, rather than internal affairs.
> 
>> 2)if we keep a chair and a deputy chair, it has always been planned that 
>> this position should be open to vote at the next WCA meeting
> 
> It was my decision, made after private discussions with Ting and SJ,
> apparently in response Jimmy Wales raising this for the WMF board's
> attention immediately after my English Wikipedia ban and before the
> end of the summer conference in Washington DC, to ensure that we would
> have an election this spring for the Chair position in a more formal
> and structured way. Though our vote was valid, I was never very happy
> at being elected without competition or much discussion. For that
> reason I was not prepared to just stay in position for 2 years. You
> will recall that for the Deputy Chair position, there was a
> competition and discussion so I believe this had a firmer sense of
> democracy.
> 
>> 3) 7 council member connote decide on their own of keeping in place the 
>> deputy chair!!
> 
> Similarly, this was no a decision that was ever tabled or considered 
> necessary.
> 
>> 4)The WCA do not need continuity, since ten month we haven't been able to 
>> provide something real , I don't see why we should continue this way
> 
> We chose to radically re-frame our plans. We have done this in a way
> that does not require resolutions or complex bureaucracy to move
> forward. I don't see how asking Ziko to go through an election process
> now, helps demonstrate that we are taking an external focus. The
> election process for Chair is a different matter, it was always
> planned for March and I have chosen to bring this forward based on the
> continued private approaches to the Council from 5 WMF trustees since
> my election, who were not happy with the WCA having me as our elected
> Chair, though the WMF itself has no public position on this matter.
> 
> Thanks,
> Fae
> -- 
> Ashley Van Haeften (Fae) [email protected]
> Chapters Association Council Chair http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WCA
> Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/mfae
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

Reply via email to