Am 17.06.2013 16:01, schrieb Jan Ainali:
2013/6/17 Ilario Valdelli <valde...@gmail.com>
One of the strategic goal of the plan of wikimedia movement is the quality.
That is true. However, the strategic plan does not go into detail on how to
measure it. Is it an article that only has claims backed by sources? If so,
the bot-generated articles are very high-quality. Is it a featured article?
Then I guess that reaching the goal of 25% will be pretty tough.
Actually, the most reasonable way to reach that goal, having 12,5 million
quality articles in two years, is to use some sort of automation.
i don´t want to repeat all those arguments already quoted (lennard
already mentioned achim raschkas criticism, which i fully agree with),
since what happend, already happend, and will unstoppably happen in the
future. but i would say first of all the strategic goal is not to
contribute hundreds of mistakes a day. just to take the 1 millionth
article Erysichton elaborata: after an advice on the talk page a HUMAN
added, that the species is probably synonymized with Erysichton palmyra.
so far, so good. but even this correction is not enough. in 2010 the
genus erysichton was redefined and a new genus, jameela was described.
both taxa now desrcibed as in sv.wikipedia are invalid.
so just concerning this tiny tiny group of articles, there is already a
bunch of mistakes, the bot copied out of outdated databases. wouldn´t be
a big deal, if somebody mentioned that the articles sticked to the old
view. but that´s something a bot can´t handle. so how reliable is the
rest of the articles?
a bot can be a convenient helper for authors, who know, how to handle
it, as it seems has happened with the creation of the articles about
swedish lakes (i´m no expert with that though). but it is a desastrous
tool for our whole movement, if you create hundreds of thousands (!)
articles, without the slightest idea, how to handle the contradictions,
that will appear doubtlessly?
it´s a sad thing, that you mention quality and this action in one
truly utterly disappointed encyclopedic greetings,
Mag. Kurt Kulac, Obmann
Gesellschaft zur Förderung freien Wissens
Siebensterngasse 25/15, 1070 Wien
+43 664 4128615
Wikimedia-l mailing list