+1 > I've always been surprised how all the time this discussion re-appears, > most of the arguments are based about in-Wikipedia discussion and not > about > the impact of our goal: spread free knowledge. "What about the number of > articles? And the ranking? And the 'Random articles'?" and so on... when > most of our users don't care about that. They care about Wikipedia having > an answer when they are looking for some info, probably via Google or > through a blue link. Do you really think they will notice or care if it > was > made by human or a bot? > > I don't think bots are the solution and they will always have some > particular issues, but please, focus the discussion if the content created > by bots are useful or not, just like any other kind of article, and not > about topics that only are important for those who love (like me) > statistics and are reeeeeeeally involved on Wikipedia. > > > *Osmar Valdebenito G.* > Director Ejecutivo > A. C. Wikimedia Argentina > > > 2013/6/27 Jon Davies <[email protected]> > >> I learnt yesterday that the Welsh Wicipedia does not have 'stubs'. It >> has >> 'Little Acorns' - so much nicer and more descriptive. >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
-- Santiago Navarro Wikimedia España http://www.wikimedia.org.es/ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
