On Jul 17, 2013, at 8:48 AM, "Tomasz W. Kozlowski" <tom...@twkozlowski.net> wrote:
> Victor Grigas wrote: > > > This was because much of the material surrounding the video was > > written in English, and there was a lot of it, so translation would > > have been slow, expensive and prone to error. > > That's what community translations are perfect for; they are free (in terms > of licence) and gratis (in terms of WMF costs), and if properly managed might > be quick in creation and might not contain too many errors (just require a > peer review before publishing). > > > We learned that YouTube does not count views from embedded videos on > > external sites. (The actual view count for that video is more like > > around half a million views.) > > My Wikipedia nature tells me to ask you for a source that can back up these > claims; both for the number of views and the fact that YouTube does not count > views from videos embedded in <iframe /> elements. I'd personally be very > suprised if they didn't; lots and lots of websites include their videos that > way, and not counting views would result in serious miscalculations that > would go into tens (or perhaps hundreds) of millions. > http://m.techcrunch.com/2008/07/18/does-google-know-how-to-count-some-youtube-views-dont-seem-to-register/ > Tomasz _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
