On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > As with so many things, it will be hard to assess cost/benefits without
> > making some effort. A safe bet could be to try with an existing pair or
> > develop a pair with an estimated high demand.
> Is there a pair where some work has already been done?

For Apertium there are quite a few already done:

Regarding new language pairs, no idea if the priorities for Wikipedia would
be the same as the priorities the Apertium community has.
It might be worth considering which languages to prioritize and how to
measure success or lack thereof.

Wikimedia-l mailing list
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Reply via email to