On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > As with so many things, it will be hard to assess cost/benefits without > > making some effort. A safe bet could be to try with an existing pair or > > develop a pair with an estimated high demand. > > Is there a pair where some work has already been done? > For Apertium there are quite a few already done: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Main_Page Regarding new language pairs, no idea if the priorities for Wikipedia would be the same as the priorities the Apertium community has. It might be worth considering which languages to prioritize and how to measure success or lack thereof. Cheers, Micru _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
