Keegan Peterzell wrote:
The discussion, as I was clarifying, was about requiring agents that had
not Identified to do so. There was no re-identifying require, which is
th point that I was making.
Oh yes, that's right. Thanks for the clarification, Keegan; I'm sorry
about the confusion.
The two are related. Both measures seek transparency, one to the WMF and
one to the community. The fact that the community side has worked is
interesting when there is pushback to private transparency.
The community side, as you call it, has received its share of comments,
criticism, and suggestions from OTRS volunteers when the issue was
brought to their (our) attention.
There have been many voices opposing the publication or at least
concerned about the possible implications of the change, just as there
are some voices expressing concerns about the apparent lack of details
and deeper thought behind some parts of the policy.
I don't think this is something new or interesting per se; people
usually tend to ask tough questions when it comes to their privacy, and
I can only hope we will be able to work out the details, and that the
WMF will be able to respond to people's concerns.
Tomasz
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
