In terms of specific articles to create, there is also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles
That project collects articles that exist in wide range of other
encyclopedias, but don't yet exist on Wikipedia. However that's not
covering quite the same concerns as the systemic-bias discussion, since
many of those encyclopedias themselves have similar biases. Nonetheless
this kind of comparison can be useful to find specific gaps in coverage
that, equally importantly, are "actionable" in the sense that at least
one source to base an article on exists.
-Mark
On 12/9/13, 9:07 PM, Peter Coombe wrote:
The English Wikipedia has attempted a (non-exhaustive) list at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Systemic_bias
Peter
On 9 December 2013 07:35, Romaine Wiki <romaine_w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
In various research and media articles is written that in several subject
groups Wikipedia is missing a lot of articles and those groups are
relatively unrepresented.
How can we as Wikipedia get clear which subject groups are missing?
How can we get lists of less represented subject groups and the articles
in those groups?
Let us get practical, ow can we fill the gap?
Greetings,
Romaine
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
