On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 April 2014 22:05, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > You haven't mentioned it on this list, but you actually accused Zack of > > violating the sockpuppetry policy on his talk page, and you threaten to > > "pursue further action." But the most cursory review of the sockpuppetry > > policy, which I assume you performed before making an accusation, reveals > > that even if he had not disclosed the Wikitedium account he would hardly > > have violated any part of the rules. Perhaps your personal feelings have > > indeed influenced your behavior here. You may want to reconsider further > > involvement. > > > +1 > > I did acknowledge that I had missed that, in my response to Erik, in my response to Zack and Risker, and also in the notes I've left on both user accounts' talk pages. http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-April/071203.html(email to Zack/Risker not yet archived) My understanding of the sock puppet policy is apparently not perfect. But I stand my my personal and professional understanding of what the best practices are for disclosure, for somebody in a leadership position in the Wikimedia movement. Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
