Re: [Wikimedia-l] Assessing this round of FDC proposals, including the WMF's proposal

[Federico Leva (Nemo)]

Risker, 28/04/2014 05:22:
There is an actual cost to the WMDE to carry out this
assessment

With which you've replied to your own questions on why WMDE. Thanks 
generous WMDE for the gift.

Gergo Tisza, 28/04/2014 04:04:
> So apparently it is less of a conflict of interest for WMF 
departments to be
> evaluated for funding by their colleagues in the other side of the 
same room
> than by WMDE? This is really getting ridiculous.

+1
Risker, can you please check that your views of what makes a COI fit in 
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Guidelines_on_potential_conflicts_of_interest> 
and propose your view on talk page if not?

Risker, 28/04/2014 04:40:
> Their opinion
> is equivalent to yours, or mine, or any other person's on this 
mailing list.

Fantastic. Then, if you're interested in providing opinions, please do 
so; you've not yet expressed a single opinion, hence I don't see why you 
worry about the value which is going to be attached to it.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/Wikimedia_Foundation/Proposal_form&action=edit&section=new

Nemo

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>