On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pete, you know the "toothbrush" image you talk about on your blog still
> shows up on a Commons search for "electric toothbrush", right? It's in
> Category:Nude
> or partially nude people with electric
> toothbrushes<
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Nude_or_partially_nude_people_with_electric_toothbrushes
> >which
> is in turn a subcategory of Category:People
> with electric toothbrushes<
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_with_electric_toothbrushes
> >so
> it shows up on any search of "electric toothbrush".
>
> Seems the whole category thing really isn't as solved as well as people
> think.  It still comes up as image #4 on a multimedia search of enwiki for
> "electric toothbrush" and about #45 for a multimedia search of
> "toothbrush".  Even though the title was changed, it remains in the
> category that gives high-ranking searches.
>


Quite. Same goes for "beads", "flashlight", or the French word for cucumber
("concombre"). The "tolling bells" toll as loudly as ever.

This Wikipedia search form is SFW (safe for work):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=&fulltext=Search&profile=images

The search results for the above terms (and many others) are not SFW.

The NSFW search results issue never was solved. It's just one of those
things there was no political will to fix.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to