That reminds me again of a really cool Guardian ad that ran on UK TV years
back.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SsccRkLLzU

It's a good illustration of how assumptions can be wrong, and how framing
can predispose you. (Captioning and file naming are part of that, of
course.)


On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Russavia <russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> Feel free to have one of the people who don't have a nasty head injury
>> ask me the question. That would be fine, and I would actually prefer
>> it. Given your head injury, I'm actually a little surprised that your
>> friends did think of asking me themselves under the circumstances.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Russavia
>>
>>
>
> Cutting to the chase, bearing in mind the location and other visual cues,
> I personally would also assume that the description was indeed apt. In
> other words, if I saw those women standing there, I'd assume they were
> prostitutes too.
>
> However, assumptions can be wrong. It would be wise for Commons to err on
> the side of caution, and not label potentially identifiable women as
> prostitutes on the basis of an unknown individual's upload to Commons.
>
> This is a good example:
>
>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Street_prostitute_EP_Blvd_02_Memphis_TN.jpg
>
> She might well be a prostitute. She might also (for example) just have had
> a tiff with her ex-boyfriend, who snapped this picture. To be wrong in one
> out of a hundred cases like that is one time too many.
>
> In topic areas like that, I'd be far more comfortable relying on an image
> from a verifiable source like the one you mentioned in the deletion
> discussion:
>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:9.000919_Pattaya_streetscene5.jpg
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to