Hmmm,
Is that the fourth or the fifth wiki you are now indeffed from ? ;-)
(I was looking up your illustrious history while chatting with you,
and I admit I lost count somewhere along the way :-P [*])
Checking up on the nl.wikipedia discussions you had, I do agree
that the environment turned toxic pretty quickly ... once
you started throwing around insults like confetti. ;-)
You were trying to get indeffed on purpose, right!?
Only sane explanation.
Wikis are like pokemon, gotta get indeffed from them all!
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
[*] NSFL WARNING: do not look up why Russavia was decratted on
Commons: NSFL WARNING [**]
[**] I'm not entirely sure why they were *merely* decratted.
This might be a fatal flaw in commons.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 05:23:30AM +0800, Russavia wrote:
> Michel,
>
> I agree the atmosphere there is extremely toxic.
>
> For the record, I have now been indefinitely blocked on Dutch Wikipedia for
> raising serious concerns on Commons about one of their clique. Concerns
> which involved incontrovertible evidence that they have been accessing
> materials on Commons which was deleted due to privacy concerns and then
> passed around to others who wouldn't otherwise have that access.
>
> The unfunny part about it all, is that this only came to light after I
> publicly told MoiraMoira that given it was me who deleted privacy related
> images on Commons as they related to her, she should have more
> understanding on issues when subjects of articles have complaints about
> images of themselves. It then lead to that evidence being provided to me
> within minutes. The person who provided me the evidence has also been
> indefinitely blocked on Dutch Wikipedia, ostensibly for providing me with
> the evidence which included the person's first name -- a first name that
> was well known to me by way of discussion many years ago when we
> "introduced" ourselves privately on IRC.
>
> So, I agree wholeheartedly about their abusive and toxic environment, and
> don't really take any notice to those on there who call me a troll, for it
> is those people on Dutch Wikipedia who are playing unacceptable games in
> outright violation of the WMF Board resolution. They think they are
> punishing me, they are not; they are punishing the subject of the article.
>
> Regards,
>
> Russavia
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Michel Vuijlsteke <wikipe...@zog.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Quick and easy: don't bother with the Dutch Wikipedia. It is one of the
> > more toxic environments on the internet. :)
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
gpg (www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72
5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
