On 14 December 2014 at 18:27, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote: > > My reading is that your replies have a very defeatist outlook. And it > feels a bit like simple laziness ("everybody does this and we can't make > messages less awful because it's just too harrrrd"). There are a few clear > problem here and they're regularly hurting us. So one way or another, we > need to find acceptable short-term and long-term solutions. Instead of > being defeatist, we need a willingness to try and try again. :-)
En does. As and when they crack it we can export it to commons. > > Why dicey? At a minimum, we need support for basic image editing > (cropping, resizing, rotating). And there are external libraries we can > likely leverage here. > > Its not to bad with images but once you switch to video file size becomes a problem. Why is that? Isn't the most efficient and most logical path to media > donations via Commons? Is that path currently the least painful? > The reason you go via wikipedia is that they are the project with the missing images. -- geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
