2015-04-01 22:09 GMT+02:00 Marc A. Pelletier <[email protected]>: > On 15-04-01 03:58 PM, Pierre-Selim wrote: > > This is only the beginning: next step is the measurement of cute pixels, > > encyclopedic pixels and amazing pixels. > > That metric is all wrong, because it presumes that all pixels are > equally valuable. Surely, you should be also assigning weights to > pixels depending on how much information they carry - background pixels > out of the FOV aren't worth as much! > > Also, some historic pixels may be worth several newer ones. Pixel > valuation is an art as much as it is a science. >
Thank you for your valuable input, we will think about it for next iterations. > > -- Marc > > Ouais bon, poisson d'avril? :-) > :-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> -- Pierre-Selim _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
