I love today. On Apr 1, 2015 5:28 PM, "quiddity" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 15-04-01 03:58 PM, Pierre-Selim wrote: > >> This is only the beginning: next step is the measurement of cute pixels, > >> encyclopedic pixels and amazing pixels. > > > > That metric is all wrong, because it presumes that all pixels are > > equally valuable. Surely, you should be also assigning weights to > > pixels depending on how much information they carry - background pixels > > out of the FOV aren't worth as much! > > > > I assume you mean "assigning *mass*" to the pixels. Weight is so > Earth-centric! > > I would like to join the kawaii-pixel WikiProject. Please let me know > when we start debating the relative merits of various color models, > and naming conventions, and kawaii-challenged accessibility tools. > Thanks! > > -- quiddity > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
