It's an encyclopedia, Marc. The world's encyclopedia. People should be able to trust it. You and the rest of the WMF need to get that through your heads or you'll wake up one morning soon and find Wikipedia on page 2 of Google and you out of a job. This is the most important issue facing Wikipedia. Denial isn't helping.
Anthony Cole <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Marc A. Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15-04-07 12:51 PM, Anthony Cole wrote: > > Wikipedia > > should not be trusted for anything - least of all health matters . > > That's a perfectly true, but perfectly vacuous assertion. Wikipedia > should be trusted exactly as much as any other single source may be > trusted, for exactly the same reason. Striving to find the most > reliable sources is fraught with pitfalls whether you attempt do to it > yourself or rely on the collective efforts of Wikipedia editors to do so. > > Wikipedia is a giant collection of summaries and overview of topics, and > it never pretendend to be anything else. If you *end* your reasearch > there for anything of importance, then you commit as sin no graver (nor > lighter) than picking any other random book on the topic and ending your > research there. > > -- Marc > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
