Patricio, Thanks. Could you explain to us the scope of "board confidentiality", and how and where it is defined for both current and former members?
Best, Andreas On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org> wrote: > Dear Patricio, > > Thank you for your response. However, I don't quite read an explanation in > this email. You elaborate a little bit on process (nothing new or > surprising there), and the only reason I can extract from your email is > this: > > "Ultimately, the majority of the Trustees came to the opinion that we were > not able to reach a common understanding with James on fulfilling [Trustee > conduct, responsibilities, and confidentiality]" > > Are we to expect an actual explanation still with the actual reasons why > this decision was taken? Because this goes little further than the staff > members that 'leave for personal reasons'. When a significant and serious > step like this is taken, to remove a community selected board member, I do > expect a better explanation from the board towards the electorate than > this. > > I am looking forward to more - from you, from James or anyone else. > > Best, > Lodewijk > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Patricio Lorente < > patricio.lore...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you to everyone who responded to my email about the Board’s recent > > decision. We recognize this is the Board's first removal of a sitting > > Trustee, and that has led to questions and perhaps some confusion. > > > > I wanted to provide you with some additional information in response to > the > > discussions on this thread. As many of you know, we did not intend for > the > > decision to become public the way it did. We planned to have a discussion > > and decision in the meeting, but could not be certain of the outcome > ahead > > of the final vote. Since the meeting, we have taken our time to work > > together to make sure the information we share will be accurate, > > respectful, and informative to the greatest extent possible. At the same > > time, there is a limit to what the Board can share. We have fiduciary > > duties, which include Board confidentiality, and we must respect them in > > this decision as we would in others. > > > > I want to be very clear that the Board decision was not about a > difference > > of opinion on a matter of WMF direction or strategy between James and the > > other Trustees. Over the course of the past few months, the Trustees had > > multiple conversations around expectations for Trustee conduct, > > responsibilities, and confidentiality. Ultimately, the majority of the > > Trustees came to the opinion that we were not able to reach a common > > understanding with James on fulfilling those expectations. We have a duty > > as a Board to ensure we all abide by our roles and responsibilities as an > > essential condition for effective governance. I also want to reaffirm > that > > this decision was made internally, by the Board, without any outside > > influence, and according to the process outlined in our Bylaws. > > > > Under the Wikimedia Foundation’s Bylaws, and, in accordance with Florida > > law (where, as a 501(c)(3) charity, the Foundation is registered), > members > > of the Board who are selected through community or affiliate elections > are > > then appointed to the Board by the existing members. Since all members of > > the Board are appointed by the Board itself, the Board retains the > ability > > to manage its composition as necessary to maintain the working > environment > > required to be effective. > > > > As someone who was appointed through a community process, I understand > how > > important it is to have strong voices from the community on our Board. I > > want to be absolutely clear that this decision does not change our > > commitment to engaging with a diverse, talented, opinionated, and > > representative group of leaders to serve on our Board. It also does not > > change our commitment to encouraging and hearing different voices on > > direction and strategy. > > > > We are working with the 2015 Elections Committee to fill this vacancy > with > > a member of the Wikimedia community. This is a top priority. More > > information will be available once the Board has had a chance to confer > > with the 2015 Elections Committee. > > > > From our viewpoint, our actions around the removal are concluded. We > > sincerely hope that James will continue to be an active, constructive > part > > of the Wikimedia movement. I personally look forward to continuing > > collaboration with him. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Patricio > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > > New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>