Meh, I'm fine with people talking in any venue they wish. Speaking only for myself, I don't need to read everything everyone has written; if it's something that needs to be brought to broader attention, chances are someone will facilitate it. But I think even those who are entirely happy to be on Facebook would agree there's a bit of an irony on talking about the respect for Wikimedia community values on a site that explicitly doesn't share them.
That, and it's a bit unfair to tease people. Risker/Anne On 21 February 2016 at 22:01, Gergő Tisza <gti...@gmail.com> wrote: > One example of the shortcomings of emails as a medium for complex > discussions is how this thread about postmortems continues to be diverted > into discussions about Facebook, despite Pete's best efforts. > > At the end of the day, people will prefer tools that work well over tools > that align philosophically. One can sabotage the development of tools that > would both work well and uphold Wikimedia's values, but cannot prevent > important discussions from moving to other venues (which will necessarily > be a worse match for those values). There is a lesson there, although I'm > afraid it will take some more time before we learn it. > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>