On 27 March 2016 at 09:59, Olatunde Isaac <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have read through series of comments by amazing members of the community > here and on talk pages. Some editors argued that constituting a "Project > Accuracy Editorial Review Board" is against the spirit of Wikipedia. This is > a fallacy! Review process is impeccable in every encyclopedia You are conflating two things. No-one has said that there should be no process of reviewing edits to Wikipedia. > and normally Wikipedia articles are expected to pass through the review > process before they are visible on the main space. That's bunkum. Please learn how Wikipedia works, before you attempt to "fix" it. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
