Hoi,
I categorically oppose paying people for content. Enabling them to create
content is different. Citations is content and its quality is relevant but
only that.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 22 April 2016 at 18:54, James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do people feel about a few of the larger the Chapters funding pilots to
> have professional researchers do https://tools.wmflabs.org/citationhunt/en
> and a few other main languages?
>
> It would be great to measure the quality of results of different payment
> incentive models and rates, but this is not something that the Foundation
> could do without some risk of breaching the DMCA safe harbor provisions, as
> far as I can see. Even if I am technically wrong about that, the
> appearances would be that it's obvious exertion of what would be positive
> editorial control, which would still mean a greater likelihood of lawsuits
> by disgruntled BLP and corporate subjects who can't win in court but can
> waste everyone's money.
>
> But I would rather have multiple measurements administered by different
> parties anyway, because there are likely to be large uncontrollable sources
> of noise.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
