Actually, I believe that at some point Wikidata will be ready to ban unsourced statements (including sources to other Wikimedia projects unless appropriate), which will automatically solve the BLP issue.
Cheers Yaroslav On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Peter Southwood < peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> wrote: > Yes, this is one of the reasons why data from Wikidata must only be > included in a Wikipedia at the discretion of users of that specific > Wikipedia, like images from Commons. > Cheers, > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On > Behalf Of Gerard Meijssen > Sent: Sunday, 17 September 2017 10:14 AM > To: Wikimedia Mailing List > Subject: [Wikimedia-l] BLP and the Wikidata / Wikipedia controversy > > Hoi, > There is a lot to do about the current absence of a BLP policy at Wikidata. > Many people, particularly those involved in Wikipedia, insist on one and a > policy that is a mirror image of their policy. > > I am opposed to such an approach because it will be detrimental to the > best practices in Wikidata and it will stifle the inclusion of data. > Nevertheless there is a need for better quality particularly where it > concerns BLP. > > Only being against is a bad position so I have laid out the arguments for > a more inclusive BLP and quality approach [1]. It does bring many of the > relevant questions together. > > What this approach accomplishes is: > * better quality in both Wikipedia and Wikidata > * an opt in change in the Wikipedia environment that links blue and red > links to Wikidata items > * it allows for the Wikidata best practices > * it invites any Wikimedia collaborator to make a positive difference for > our overall BLP. > > What it does not provide is an instant BLP solution for Wikidata, this is > not realistic given the huge number of items involved, people often > specific to one or no Wikipedia. It will not convince everyone and that too > is to be expected. After all the proof of the pudding is in the eating and > not so much in the endless bickering. > Thanks, > GerardM > > [1] > https://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2017/09/wikimedia- > and-its-blp-approach.html > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > http://www.avg.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
