Michal,

stop those personal attacks. No one lies to you, nor to anyone else. Matej
is a good and fair chairman. I am exhausted from watching time and again
your unfounded accusations on Matej, me, and whoever you mind. Please, stop
it!

Radoslava Semanová
Vice-chair of Wikimedians Slovakia User group

ut 26. 10. 2021 o 21:55 Michal Matúšov <[email protected]>
napísal(a):

> Hi.
>
> Just a small factual update:
>
> In the presented list of issues there is:
> "Allegedly AffCom informed representatives of WUG WMSVK that it was me who
> canceled the proposed mediation about WUG WMSVK's long-term bylaws
> violations (while it is false - I haven't cancelled it) and AffCom never
> ever confirmed to me whether it really provided this false information (to
> my best Knowledge it was AffCom (or maybe someone who ordered it to
> AffCom?) who canceled the mediation; but AffCom never clarified it to me
> even after my explicit requests)"
>
> Thanks to Matej Grochal, the Chair of WUG WMSVK, who has shed light on
> this topic! He confirmed that AffCom did **not** make this untruthful
> communication to WUG WMSVK (as he had stated before). Rather, Grochal /
> WMSVK have connected some data points in a wrong way, came to wrong
> conclusion and presented it as a clear truth about someone else behaviour.
> Although, it would be definitely helpful if AffCom would clearly stated it
> when I have asked it. So we could move forward sooner and not waste time,
> effort and energy asking AffCom for answer and WUG WMSVK for proof.
>
> Regards
> KuboF Hromoslav (Michal Matúšov)
>
>
> po 25. 10. 2021 o 12:32 Michal Matúšov <[email protected]>
> napísal(a):
>
>> Dear Mehman (and Wikimedia folks in copy for transparency),
>>
>> I am contacting you as you are currently the highest responsible person
>> (Vice-Chair) in the Affiliations Committee.
>>
>> As Manavpreet Kaur (current AffCom's Staff Liaison) is candidating for
>> a Movement Charter Drafting Committee, and AffCom is for (at least) months
>> showing issues about its work, which I consider that would be detrimental
>> for the work of the Movement Charter Drafting Committee if they would be
>> present there, and it is unclear what it Manavpreet's role in these
>> AffCom's issues, I ask you to  publicly respond to the questions below. (I
>> have already asked Manavpreet to respond them but she have stated that she
>> won't be able to respond them [1] [2])
>>
>> (I present the questions first and the context below, so it is easier for
>> low-involved folks to get the core part)
>>
>> *Questions:*
>>
>>
>>    1. *Do you personally consider the AffCom's happenings presented
>>    below to be in line with Wikimedia Foundation Guiding Principles
>>    <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Guiding_Principles> 
>> (especially Transparency and Accountability)?*
>>       1. *If not, has Manavpreet done already something to rectify
>>       AffCom's activity to be in full alignment with them? What
>>       has Manavpreet done?*
>>       2. *If yes, please briefly clarify how (in your opinion) they are
>>       showing Transparency and Accountability.*
>>    2. *What is Manavpreet's role in the AffCom's happenings presented
>>    below?* (have Manavpreet supported / encouraged / decided them? or
>>    have Manavpreet tried to prevent them / discourage them? or have 
>> Manavpreet
>>    just fully neutraly executed decisions that leaded to them? have 
>> Manavpreet
>>    presented objections that the decisions are against Wikimedia Foundation
>>    Guiding Principles or similar rules / recommendations / ...? or something
>>    else? please be concrete)
>>    3. As much of the presented cases show AffCom's issues about clear,
>>    proactive communication, *do you consider Manavpreet to be capable
>>    enough to clearly, proactively, helpfully communicate in the high
>>    responsibility role of Movement Charter Drafting Committee member?*
>>       1. *If it is not Manavpreet who is the source of AffCom's
>>       communication issues, who is?*
>>    4. *Do you believe that Manavpreet will not "import" AffCom-like
>>    issues to the Movement Charter Drafting Committee? If yes, on what basis?*
>>
>>
>> *Context:*
>>
>> I am in contact with Manavpreet mostly because of her role of Staff
>> Liaison of Affiliations Committee
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee> (AffCom), which
>> relates with my roles of (ex)Chair of some Wikimedia Affiliations. While
>> AffCom have for years reputation of slowresponsedness, it was understanable
>> because of its structure (which, in turn, is understanable because of its
>> high responsibilities) and was rather only a little anoyance, not a big
>> deal. But that have changed (for worse) at least several months ago and
>> AffCom is still very reluctant to provide more information about it.
>> Several specific cases for ilustration:
>>
>>    - AffCom put on hold the recognition of User Group Esperanto and Free
>>    Knowledge
>>    
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Esperanto_kaj_Libera_Scio>
>>  as
>>    a Thematic Organisation and informed the UG only reactively (after my
>>    question), after unreasonably long time (after the expected deadline for
>>    recognition) and provided false information as the reason; even after
>>    several messages AffCom haven't revealed the requested information about
>>    the pausing
>>    - In February 2021, Meta admins deferred to AffCom the determination
>>    of some specific hard Requests for deletion
>>    
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_deletion/Archives/2020#Wikimedians_of_Slovakia's_Annual_Report_2018>
>>  with
>>    intention to implement AffCom's determination; despite Manavpreet (in
>>    her official WMF role) have considered it as a priority concern
>>    <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/21238644>, Affcom have
>>    not provided its determination to Meta admins even after 7 months (as
>>    stated by 3 Meta admins - 2 of them confirming publicly: Xaosflux
>>    <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/21998260> and Camouflaged
>>    Mirage <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/22000846> (by
>>    their alternative account))
>>    - AffCom was for several months totally unresponsive about proposed
>>    recommendations to make WUG Wikimedians of Slovakia
>>    <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Slovakia> to obey its
>>    User Group Agreement
>>    - For quite long time AffCom have been requiring (that time not yet a
>>    WUG) Wikimedians of Slovakia
>>    <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Slovakia> (WUG WMSVK)
>>    to change its legal name to be recognized as a WM User Group, what blocked
>>    the recognition for more than year, but suddenly after the recognition ,
>>    AffCom agreed to accept Wikimedians of Slovakia
>>    <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Slovakia>'s prefered
>>    official name which was for long time totaly unaccepted by AffCom
>>    - Allegedly AffCom informed representatives of WUG WMSVK that it was
>>    me who canceled the proposed mediation about WUG WMSVK's long-term bylaws
>>    violations (while it is false - I haven't cancelled it) and AffCom never
>>    ever confirmed to me whether it really provided this false information (to
>>    my best Knowledge it was AffCom (or maybe someone who ordered it to
>>    AffCom?) who canceled the mediation; but AffCom never clarified it to me
>>    even after my explicit requests)
>>    - AffCom is for months in silence about various questions and
>>    proposals about WUG WMSVK for whom is AffCom fully responsible since
>>    December 2020
>>    - As AffCom in December 2020 took full responsibility for WUG WMSVK,
>>    AffCom is fully reponsible for:
>>       - WUG WMSVK falsely publicly presents the meeting on March 2019 as
>>       a valid Meeting of General Assembly
>>       
>> <http://wikimedia.sk//wp-content/uploads/2019/07/WMSK-VZ-20190309-ZAP.pdf> 
>> despite
>>       it clearly violates WUG WMSVK's bylaw and several WUG WMSVK's board 
>> members
>>       have already stated it, also publicly
>>       - It is still not clear whether WUG WMSVK's meeting in March 2021
>>       was a valid Meeting of General Assembly, as evidence suggest it was 
>> not,
>>       despite AffCom being repeatedly warned in advance about this 
>> possibility
>>       - WMF is publicly hosting documents produced by WUG WMSVK that
>>       contain false, defamatory information about myself (en
>>       
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Slovakia/Reports/2018/en>
>>       , sk
>>       
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Slovakia/Reports/2018/sk>)
>>       despite Manavpreet assurance that WUG WMSVK will rectify them
>>       <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/21238644>
>>       - WUG WMSVK is no longer publicly presenting its *Annual plans*
>>       
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Slovakia/Annual_agendas> 
>> despite
>>       its tradition of presenting them publicly, and is not presenting 
>> publicly
>>       its *Financial reports* and *Annual Budgets* despite the tradition
>>       of publicly presenting such documents and having the capacity to 
>> create at
>>       least *Annual budget* since at least 2018. All of these 3
>>       documents are required to be prepared every year by WMSVK's Board.
>>
>> I understand that Manavpreet personally is not an AffCom and not a voting
>> member. At the same time, I understand that Manavpreet is a paid staff
>> member whose job is liaisoning for AffCom and is often in contact with at
>> least some affiliations and proposed affiliations. So Manavpreet's
>> responsibility to AffCom is still present, although I do not know what is
>> its span.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Manavpreet_Kaur#Your_role_in_AffCom%27s_issues_in_relation_to_your_Movement_Charter_Drafting_Committee_member_candidacy
>> [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/22236019
>>
>> Looking for your answers!
>> KuboF Hromoslav (Michal Matúšov)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/376VB7L655LJT34DBMW5JNOOOLUPXRFY/
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/QNZ6BLDA6ZTJCFFSOQSHAV4TL5AWXJN6/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to