Thanks for bringing this also, Xavier. Last Wikimania I went to a great session 
about the new tools the Research Team is building. Most of them are really 
useful. It's a pity I can't find them if I don't try to search specifically for 
them, and that no one will ever find them because we don't have those tools are 
external and not integrated in our platforms. This is another great example of 
the lack of ambition in the product infrastructure.

I really hope someone will handle these issues, but I have more doubts that it 
will happen by the day.

Have a nice weekend to those that have weekends,

Galder
________________________________
From: Kimmo Virtanen <kimmo.virta...@wikimedia.fi>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 12:23 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: We need more interactive content: we are doing it 
wrong

Hi,

Could somebody explain what is problem with VP9 or AV1 with WebM container? 
These are supported in Wikimedia Commons.

Br,
-- Kimmo Virtanen / Zache

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:05 PM Brion Vibber 
<bvib...@wikimedia.org<mailto:bvib...@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
Converting them to suitably compact files in h.264/aac in .MP4 format would be 
by far the simplest way. Use ffmpeg as we do on the server side for online 
playback.

Conforming to the arbitrary Wikimedia prohibition on h.264 you could use mpeg-4 
visual instead, still in .mp4 - afaik patents are expired and it'll play in 
standalone files (not in HLS)

If you jump through enough hoops you might get vp9 working in HLS offline, but 
adaptive streaming may be irrelevant to offline use.

-- brion

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024, 12:52 PM James Heilman 
<jmh...@gmail.com<mailto:jmh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It would be amazing if one could play videos on iPhones when the videos are 
within ZIMs in an offline environment aswell. Brion not sure what barriers 
there are to this currently?

James

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:48 PM Paulo Santos Perneta 
<paulospern...@gmail.com<mailto:paulospern...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Should read 2030 Strategy, not 2023 strategy, sorry.

Paulo Santos Perneta <paulospern...@gmail.com<mailto:paulospern...@gmail.com>> 
escreveu (terça, 23/01/2024 à(s) 19:41):
I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. We are currently grappling with 
rather rudimentary approaches when it comes to uploading and reusing video and 
music files...
The incredibly useful Graph has been down for quite some time. The extensive 
capabilities of Wikidata query representations, particularly with geolocated 
data on maps, appear to have barely scratched the surface. Listeria frequently 
experiences issues and underwent a major update that disrupted previous queries.

On a personal note, I attempted to create a dynamic digital library of works 
under a free license using Wikidata for our Digital Humanistics centre. 
However, I discovered that with the available tools, I would need to code the 
presentation myself, as the options for reuse outside of Wikidata were very 
basic.

On the whole, the Wikipedia experience remains challenging, especially for 
newcomers. The much wanted Visual Editor developments and improvements seem to 
have stopped years ago. The recent changes made by the 'Desktop Improvement' 
team to the default Wikipedia skin seem to be more geared towards readers than 
editors and have apparently worsened the overall experience, according to 
feedback I've received from newcomers.

These are just a few instances that have underscored, and continue to 
underscore, my belief that we are likely not on the path towards achieving the 
objectives outlined in the 2023 Strategy.

My personal impression is that the issue doesn't necessarily stem from a lack 
of funding to pursue these objectives but rather from the ineffective 
expenditure and allocation of those funds. I wish I knew how to contribute to 
changing or improving this situation.
It would also be great to see a comment/opinion from current CEO Maryana 
Iskander on this state of affairs, and if there is some roadmap for improving 
it.

Best,
Paulo


Galder Gonzalez Larrañaga <galder...@hotmail.com<mailto:galder...@hotmail.com>> 
escreveu (terça, 23/01/2024 à(s) 11:03):
Dear wikimedians,
Nearly one year ago, the Graphs extension was disabled from all wikis, because 
there was a security issue that should be solved 
(https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T334940). A wide team from the WMF worked on 
a solution for some weeks, but after Northern Hemisphere spring ended, summer 
came, then the monsoon season, and now it is again summer in the Southern 
Hemisphere... and Graphs are still disabled. All the solutions proposed have 
been dismissed, but every two months there's a proposal to make a new roadmap 
to solve the issue. We have plenty of roadmaps, but no vehicle to reach our 
destination.

Seven years ago, we were discussing our Strategy for 2030. We used thousands of 
volunteer hours, thousands of staff hours and millions of dollars to build a 
really well-balanced strategy. There we concluded that "By 2030, Wikimedia will 
become the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge". We 
also made some recommendations to improve the User Experience 
(https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Strategy/Recommendations/Improve_User_Experience)
 and claimed that we wanted to Innovate in Free Knowledge 
(https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Strategy/Recommendations/Innovate_in_Free_Knowledge).
 Well, the situation is now worse than it was seven years ago, let me give some 
examples:


  *   Graph extension is used in thousands of pages, some of them highly 
relevant, as COVID or Climate Change information. There are thousands of graphs 
broken now, and the only partial solution give is loading these graphs as 
images, instead of promoting an interactive solution.
  *
Meanwhile, a place like Our World in Data has been publishing data and 
interactive content with a compatible license for years. (Remember, "By 2030, 
Wikimedia will become the essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free 
knowledge"). Trying to add this data and graphs to Wikimedia projects has been 
done by WikiMed, and it is technically possible, but still blocked to deploy 
(https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T303853).
  *   Wolfram Alpha is like a light year ahead us on giving interactive 
solutions to knowledge questions, even the silliest ones 
(https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=how+many+oranges+fit+in+the+Earth%3F). We 
have good technical articles about a lot of things, but sometimes "becoming the 
essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge" needs to provide 
solutions to exact problems, like the answer to an equation, and how to solve 
it. That's also "free knowledge".
  *
Brilliant (https://brilliant.org/) is brilliant if you want to learn lots of 
things, like geometry or programming. Way better than Wikipedia. But... you 
need to pay for it. How could we even try if we can't add anything interactive 
to our platforms?
  *   We can build interactive timelines using Wikidata, but we can't embed 
them at Wikipedia. Weird, because I can do it in any external page. Hopefully, 
Histropedia will do it better. http://histropedia.com/<http://histropedia.com/>
  *   We could have something very special: inline links in video and audio 
subtitles. We used to have them, but the new video infrastructure doesn't allow 
it. Imagine a world where you can watch a video and link a link in the 
subtitles just to know more about that.
  *   ...

The list can go on an on ("which phase the moon is today?"), but I think that 
the idea is clear. We could have interactive content, but we are going in the 
opposite direction, and every year we are further from our goal, because other 
platforms are doing it better, way better. And this seems like some wild ideas, 
but then I read the 2023-2024 annual plan section called "Wiki Experiences" 
(https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2023-2024/Goals/Infrastructure#Bucket:_Wiki_Experiences)
 and it looks like we should be going there. But we aren't.

I'm sorry if this e-mail feels bitter. My experience in the last years is that 
we are now further of what we need that we were before, even if many chapters 
and volunteers are trying to overturn it.

Thank to everyone who have been trying.

Galder









_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- 
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, 
guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/T3TDXNOYBO2OUJVSKBOEFLY4I34YEA5B/
To unsubscribe send an email to 
wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- 
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, 
guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/5WAACT3V43UAL3JRF6VRRDTW4BBBGCOE/
To unsubscribe send an email to 
wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org>


--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- 
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, 
guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/ECDI7DM34JMHKSMOXRWWOVEXQNOK53SR/
To unsubscribe send an email to 
wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- 
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>, 
guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/W47FVLTA2JLA4QGFW5OUTE3PQUR2ETUE/
To unsubscribe send an email to 
wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/WXVHNGWA4T5IF5KJTHADSQB7746TDBFR/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to