On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:05:04 +1100 "private musings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right now, my feeling is that there's just a bit of a missing layer of > controls / policies / practice in how Wikimedia handles some material > - which means on balance I couldn't in good faith recommend to a > School Librarian that they allow full access to the projects from > their computers... or to put it another way - if we visit a school > advocating high levels of active engagement in the project, we should > understand that the Principle might be upset, or get complaints from > upset parents that things like; > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Erotic > > come under our 'banner' - not safe for work, nothing hugely > offensive, but available through Wikimedia pages, and likely to be > the sort of thing schools would like to avoid? I never knew that category existed - then again, I never thought too look. Thats posted in the commons - does that mean those images are part of Wikipedia, or "just" sister projects? kk > cheers, > > Peter > PM. > -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian user / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group _______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
