2009/1/27 Andrew <orderinchao...@gmail.com>: > (whoops, pressed send by accident) ... was omitted entirely. The bit they > did quote ran something like, the needs of the encyclopaedia for neutral > reliable articles and the needs of the community which maintained the > articles needed to be balanced, and that there was a risk that in effect we > might end up favouring one perspective over another based simply on the > length of time people had been around. > > 2009/1/27 Andrew <orderinchao...@gmail.com> >> >> Eek, yes I heard it online via Sydney local radio. I was quoted verbatim >> but they used the second half of my quote, meaning that the part where I >> said that BLP was the biggest challenge to the encyclopaedia at present and >> that this was agreed by most, and that a solution was required, but the >> question was over the technical merits of this particular proposal.
Don't worry, my quotes were also chopped in half. I guess we just need to learn to never say anything that requires a caveat. :) <http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2475604.htm> Lulz at being "Wikipedia's Australian President". hehe. not quite. cheers Brianna -- They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment: http://modernthings.org/ _______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
