On 2 September 2010 13:46, private musings <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm growing increasingly concerned with the way the AGM is being > prepared, and though there may be nothing to worry about, I would > greatly appreciate a response to my questions below, to which I'd only > add a polite inquiry as to why and how the decision was taken to move > to a postal vote this year ( > http://www.wikimedia.org.au/w/index.php?title=2010-2011_AGM&curid=535&diff=2813&oldid=2805 > ) - seems a little odd to me, strange that it shouldn't have been > announced perhaps a little wider, and fwiw, I haven't received any > post of any kind from WMAU to date - should I have? >
I'll confirm that I haven't received any info for a while, either. It makes me wonder about what the plan is for the AGM. All I can say is that there's supposed to be a minimum 14 days notice, according to the rules, so I'm also feeling a bit anxious as to what's happening with the voting and whatnot. Snail mail isn't instantaneous. -- Lloyd Nguyen [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
