Cuidado com o que? seja claro ou resigne-se ao silêncio. Melhor direcionar
suas "dicas" em off para quem for de direito e poupar a lista de seus
faniquitos.

Otavio

Em 25 de janeiro de 2012 23:21, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Porque a carapuça serviu?
> E não é uma ameaça, estou falando para terem cuidado, pelas respostas
> off que eu recebi é só isso.
>
> Paranoia ta foda aqui
>
> On Jan 25, 1:30 pm, Otavio Louvem <otavio1981.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Não bastasse a falta de educação recorrente, agora vai ameaçar outros
> > voluntários?
> >
> > OTAVIO1981
> >
> > Em 25 de janeiro de 2012 11:58, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
> > rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Só para os puxas-sacos que eu estou metendo pau de novo. E se forem
> > > puxar-saco, tomem cuidado, fica a dica.
> >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com>
> > > Date: 25 January 2012 11:51
> > > Subject: Waste of money, Wikipediacentrism. - Brazil
> > > To: foundatio...@lists.wikimedia.org
> >
> > > Dear all,
> > > Well as you know, Brazil is a priority, but when spending is a waste.
> > > We have a volunteer group that operates in Brazil since 2008 in direct
> > > contact with the problems of Brazil, know much about the free national
> > > culture, know a lot about education in the country, and their
> projects, they
> > > can tell the reasons why Brazil has poor performance on Wikipedia.
> > > Wikimedia Foundation conducted several interviews with the group, I was
> > > interviewed three times and had several conversations with several
> different
> > > employees. Also recently a person was hired to do a search on this,
> already
> > > operating in Brazil.
> > > And yesterday they announced the arrival of two more employees to ask
> only
> > > that, again. [1] They already have the answer to these interviews, what
> > > they are asking again?
> >
> > > And what I find worse is the fact that there is a prohibitive message
> for
> > > explanation of other Wikimedia projects. As for the local group that
> > > Wikipedia is not central. And there will be an office of WMF, only to
> > > activities for Wikipedia. And many Brazilians criticize the model of
> the
> > > WMF, and that centralization in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is only the tenth
> > > seventh most visited site in the country. Need better, yes, but the
> > > problem is the community that is not healthy, and that the WMF does not
> > > interfere on that. So it's skating, and spending resources
> unnecessarily.
> >
> > > Several staff members say the Wikipedia impact is larger than the other
> > > projects.
> > > Which has more impact for you?
> > > "The Movement Wikimedia projects through education, created free
> > > educational resources available in Wikibooks, and classes on
> Wikiversity,
> > > this could change the lives of thousands of poor children" or
> > > "The Movement Wikimedia succeeded in creating an encyclopaedia in
> > > Portuguese high quality "
> >
> > > Unfortunately I live in a country that 38% of teens lives in extreme
> > > poverty [2], how they want to create a program just with universities,
> to
> > > share knowledge if people that never walk inside one university? Or not
> > > be able to read the contents of Wikipedia because they were not
> properly
> > > literate. I'm not talking to literate Brazilians, I'm talking to
> create free
> > > educational resources, and create classes, and encourage businesses
> and organizations
> > > to do that change, this is a collaborative work.
> >
> > > With the money spent to keep three people six days in Brazil from the
> U.S.A.,
> > > we could fund a fellow to start a social work with teachers to create
> this
> > > material.What is the interest of the WMF on this? "Our priority is
> > > Wikipedia"
> >
> > > *Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
> > > the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
> > > *
> > > I'll keep imagining, and having to push myself very hard to see this
> > > world. That will never be reached by Wikipedia alone.Especially in
> Brazil.
> >
> > > If it were to promote Wikipedia as a site, it would be best to hire a
> company,
> > > not a Foundation, if that way selected, do things as a Foundation.
> >
> > > Sorry for my English, I'm tired and I didn't review.
> >
> > > [1]
> > >https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Esplanada/geral/Wikip%C3.
> ..
> > > [2]
> > >http://noticias.r7.com/brasil/noticias/adolescentes-sao-mais-pobres-q.
> ..
> >
> > > --
> > > Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
> > > rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com
> > > +55 11 7971-8884
> >
> > > --
> > > Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
> > > rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com
> > > +55 11 7971-8884
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > WikimediaBR-l mailing list
> > > wikimediab...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > >https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
> >
> > --
> > Abs,
> > Otavio
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikimediaBR-l mailing list
> > WikimediaB...@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://
> lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikimediaBR-l mailing list
> WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
>



-- 
Abs,
Otavio
_______________________________________________
WikimediaBR-l mailing list
WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l

Responder a