Hi Arun, In fact I am sorry. Sorry for taking the real bunter so seriously and personally, sorry for having a go at you.
Guys here kept on convincing me that it was a joke, but I was blinded so much in my false anger. I really apologise for that. I have inly seen all serious discussions and allegations recently and from the very first day of joining this list, that I could simply not think that someone mught even joke here. Regards, Dhaval On 11 May 2012 12:18, "Arun Ganesh" <arun.plane...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Dhaval S. Vyas <dsv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes Srikant, I am following the bug so am aware that its approaching >> closure. >> >> Arun, >> >> This email is for you, probably you might consider doing some research, >> as Srikant did, before making such silly comments on a wider forums. That >> could probably save others' time in advocating you. >> > Dhaval, I apologize. I did not think that a little joke might have been > taken in this way. I tend to see problems at the source and I was just > wondering why nobody tries to get such strange policies revoked that force > people to use outdated technology. Sorry, once again, no offence meant :) > -Arun > > >> Regards, >> Dhaval >> On 11 May 2012 11:44, "Srikanth Lakshmanan" <srik....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Dhaval S. Vyas <dsv...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Arun, >>>> >>>> Are you really in senses? If so, why don't you take my case? >>>> >>>> Mark/All, >>>> >>>> Please close this bug and don't do anything to resolve the issue, as >>>> someone in this world thinks its my personal problem. Please that smartest >>>> lot and close the bug. >>>> >>> Dhaval, >>> >>> As you would have got the update by now, a fix was made and bug is on >>> its way to closure (with a resolution.) post deployment[1]. >>> >>> There is no need to take offense on Arun's comment. It probably came >>> because he was bothered more about the lack of choice at certain places >>> than the technicalities given that lot of us value freedom and choice. >>> Nonetheless, IE7 should still be supported as it still gets 4% (861 M) of >>> all page requests[2] to Wikimedia. There would be hundreds of people who >>> might have the choice but prefer to use IE7 as their choice for reasons up >>> to them and bugs are welcome on IE7 as long as its still in use and >>> supported by Microsoft. >>> >>> [1] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36275#c10 >>> [2] http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportClients.htm >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Srikanth.L >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list >>> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimediaindia-l mailing list >> Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list > Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l
