2009/1/24 Michael Peel <em...@mikepeel.net>: > > On 24 Jan 2009, at 21:53, James Farrar wrote: > >> 2009/1/24 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>: >>> 2009/1/24 Andrew Turvey <ratur...@yahoo.co.uk>: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> We're looking for one or more people who is able to help the >>>> chapter by >>>> volunteering to act as a teller for the AGM. Ideally we would >>>> want one or >>>> two people who could manage the process from start to end: >>>> >>>> - receiving candidates applications by email >>> >>> You probably want to make sure someone on the board receives those >>> emails as well, since it's the board that are responsible for all >>> this >>> at the end of the day. >> >> I would agree, provided that one of the Directors isn't re-standing... > > Is there a reason why the information can't be cc'd to all directors?
My past experience as a returning officer, as a candidate, and as a candidate's agent in elections suggests that allowing candidates or potential candidates a running commentary of candidates standing negatively influences the fairness of an electoral process - and this is particularly true when only a subset of potential candidates is getting this information. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l