We should bear in mind, however, that not all the voters will be at the AGM so they may want more information before they cast their vote. May be worth filtering the questions before they're answered so that there's no repetition. I thought last year's one worked fairly well.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Dalton" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2009 15:08:21 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Election of Directors - Candidate statements and ballot paper 2009/4/8 <[email protected]>: > I've been bold and set up a page on the wiki for this at > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings/2009_AGM/Candidate_questions Can I ask that people keep questions to all candidates to a minimum? While a couple may be good, they tend to get extremely boring very quickly. Hopefully all the candidates will be at the AGM so if you turn up you can chat to us there and we'll be able to answer any general questions without resulting in a page on which everybody basically writes the same answer in different words. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
