Agreed. I'll try to keep a tight rein on it :)
2009/4/8 Andrew Turvey <[email protected]> > We should bear in mind, however, that not all the voters will be at the AGM > so they may want more information before they cast their vote. May be worth > filtering the questions before they're answered so that there's no > repetition. I thought last year's one worked fairly well. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Dalton" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2009 15:08:21 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, > Portugal > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Election of Directors - Candidate statements > and ballot paper > > 2009/4/8 <[email protected]>: > > I've been bold and set up a page on the wiki for this at > > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings/2009_AGM/Candidate_questions > > Can I ask that people keep questions to all candidates to a minimum? > While a couple may be good, they tend to get extremely boring very > quickly. Hopefully all the candidates will be at the AGM so if you > turn up you can chat to us there and we'll be able to answer any > general questions without resulting in a page on which everybody > basically writes the same answer in different words. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
