On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > (Did you intend to send that to the public list? Either way, it's here > now, so replying on-list.) > > The law is fine, it's just being misapplied. Writing an encyclopaedia > doesn't increase knowledge, it's a tertiary source, all the knowledge > is already in existence. It disseminates knowledge, something I > consider to be pretty synonymous with "education". I think at this > point we need a lawyer. I'll look up that case
For reference, the case is online here: http://www.btinternet.com/~akme/shaw.html though with terrible markup. I'll look for LexisNexis sources and similar, but those are typically not public, so I thought I'd share that one with the list. M. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
