On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Bod Notbod <[email protected]> wrote: > There's also the argument that "due to the unique way the BBC is > funded" some of their content *should* be more available to the public
One problem is their funding can be interpreted as meaning the content should only be made available to the public _in the UK_. Which led to the strange "UK only licence" at http://www.bbc.co.uk/creativearchive/licence/index.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/virtualrevolution/licences/digitalrevolution_licence.shtml is a second example of them making up their own license. They have also released some things under a real Creative Commons license, but as far as I know, only ever one of the "non-commercial" ones. eg http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13946 Angela _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
