On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Angela <[email protected]> wrote: > One problem is their funding can be interpreted as meaning the content > should only be made available to the public _in the UK_. Which led to > the strange "UK only licence" at > http://www.bbc.co.uk/creativearchive/licence/index.shtml > http://www.bbc.co.uk/virtualrevolution/licences/digitalrevolution_licence.shtml > is a second example of them making up their own license. > They have also released some things under a real Creative Commons > license, but as far as I know, only ever one of the "non-commercial" > ones. eg http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/13946
Thanks for the links, they've led me to some content I didn't know about. A shame they've made their own licence. I suppose I understand the 'non-commercial' aspect. Still, perhaps they can be persuaded towards Wikipedia friendliness. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
