Certainly my sense of the various discussions over the past 18 months is that there's near-consensus on STV as the best alternative to the current system. I intend to draft a motion with new election rules for STV; if anyone has other systems they'd like to put forward I'll be happy to draft election rules for them.
However, if we have more than two systems to choose between, we then have to decide which system to choose to decide which system we use... On 17 September 2012 22:54, rexx <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem probably lies with the volume of business on each board > meeting agenda. We're only just keeping up with the business, and as much > as I'd like to see a constructive discussion and a positive decision made > on the future election process, I personally won't find the time in the > near future to organise an EGM. > > I'm encouraged by James' offer, and the more volunteers we have who would > be willing to devote some time into defining the parameters for discussion > (maybe a proposer and seconder for a resolution?), or suggesting possible > timescales and venues for an EGM, the easier it gets to fulfil our > commitment to having a new process in place by the next AGM. > > All contributions are welcome. > > -- > Doug > > > > On 17 September 2012 22:24, James Farrar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Now that I am no longer in the process of getting married, I can start >> making some progress on this. >> On Sep 17, 2012 9:48 PM, "Chris Keating" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Lodewijk >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Chris, if I may at least ask for a very short clarification of the no: >>>> are you confirming there has been no communication/decision on the issue on >>>> board level, or do you confirm there will be no such EGM (as far as the >>>> board is concerned)? >>> >>> >>> There has been no progress. :-) >>> >>> Personally I would quite like some progress, and think we ought to use >>> STV - it would be great if people could get drafting resolutions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
