OK, here's a very quick first draft of the motion and election rules for STV.
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:LondonStatto/Proposed_EGM_Motion_on_Voting_System http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:LondonStatto/Proposed_STV_Election_Rules Thoughts, questions, suggestions all gratefully received. I'm not at work tomorrow so will do my best to monitor email/talk pages. J. On 17 September 2012 23:03, James Farrar <james.far...@gmail.com> wrote: > Certainly my sense of the various discussions over the past 18 months is > that there's near-consensus on STV as the best alternative to the current > system. I intend to draft a motion with new election rules for STV; if > anyone has other systems they'd like to put forward I'll be happy to draft > election rules for them. > > However, if we have more than two systems to choose between, we then have > to decide which system to choose to decide which system we use... > > > On 17 September 2012 22:54, rexx <r...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >> The problem probably lies with the volume of business on each board >> meeting agenda. We're only just keeping up with the business, and as much >> as I'd like to see a constructive discussion and a positive decision made >> on the future election process, I personally won't find the time in the >> near future to organise an EGM. >> >> I'm encouraged by James' offer, and the more volunteers we have who would >> be willing to devote some time into defining the parameters for discussion >> (maybe a proposer and seconder for a resolution?), or suggesting possible >> timescales and venues for an EGM, the easier it gets to fulfil our >> commitment to having a new process in place by the next AGM. >> >> All contributions are welcome. >> >> -- >> Doug >> >> >> >> On 17 September 2012 22:24, James Farrar <james.far...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Now that I am no longer in the process of getting married, I can start >>> making some progress on this. >>> On Sep 17, 2012 9:48 PM, "Chris Keating" <chriskeatingw...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Lodewijk >>>> <lodew...@effeietsanders.org>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Chris, if I may at least ask for a very short clarification of the no: >>>>> are you confirming there has been no communication/decision on the issue >>>>> on >>>>> board level, or do you confirm there will be no such EGM (as far as the >>>>> board is concerned)? >>>> >>>> >>>> There has been no progress. :-) >>>> >>>> Personally I would quite like some progress, and think we ought to use >>>> STV - it would be great if people could get drafting resolutions. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimedia UK mailing list >>> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
