On the first point, granted. I'll attempt to come up with a clearer description.

I don't think that an instruction from the members to the Board to make a 
particular purchase sets a precedent that all Board purchases must be 
authorised by the membership. Would appreciate Office input on this point 
though.



On 29 Sep 2012, at 21:55, Andrew Turvey <andrewrtur...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On a different note...
> 
> Regarding the switch from approval voting to STV (or whatever) what I think 
> is missing the most is a clear statement setting out the reasons for the 
> change (i.e. what's broken and how would this change fix it).
> 
> I've also suggested a tweak to the EGM motion on the page (hope this is ok to 
> do there)
> 
> Lastly, we could do with pencilling in a date for the EGM - how about 
> coinciding with the board meeting 9-10 February 2013 - and aim to do it by 
> electronic voting as much as possible.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Andrew
> 
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:26 PM, James Farrar <james.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, here's a very quick first draft of the motion and election rules for STV.
> 
> http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:LondonStatto/Proposed_EGM_Motion_on_Voting_System
>  
> 
> http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:LondonStatto/Proposed_STV_Election_Rules 
> 
> Thoughts, questions, suggestions all gratefully received. I'm not at work 
> tomorrow so will do my best to monitor email/talk pages.
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> On 17 September 2012 23:03, James Farrar <james.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Certainly my sense of the various discussions over the past 18 months is that 
> there's near-consensus on STV as the best alternative to the current system. 
> I intend to draft a motion with new election rules for STV; if anyone has 
> other systems they'd like to put forward I'll be happy to draft election 
> rules for them.
> 
> However, if we have more than two systems to choose between, we then have to 
> decide which system to choose to decide which system we use...
> 
> 
> On 17 September 2012 22:54, rexx <r...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> The problem probably lies with the volume of business on each board meeting 
> agenda. We're only just keeping up with the business, and as much as I'd like 
> to see a constructive discussion and a positive decision made on the future 
> election process, I personally won't find the time in the near future to 
> organise an EGM.
> 
> I'm encouraged by James' offer, and the more volunteers we have who would be 
> willing to devote some time into defining the parameters for discussion 
> (maybe a proposer and seconder for a resolution?), or suggesting possible 
> timescales and venues for an EGM, the easier it gets to fulfil our commitment 
> to having a new process in place by the next AGM.
> 
> All contributions are welcome.
> 
> -- 
> Doug
> 
> 
> 
> On 17 September 2012 22:24, James Farrar <james.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now that I am no longer in the process of getting married, I can start making 
> some progress on this.
> 
> On Sep 17, 2012 9:48 PM, "Chris Keating" <chriskeatingw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org> wrote:
> Chris, if I may at least ask for a very short clarification of the no: are 
> you confirming there has been no communication/decision on the issue on board 
> level, or do you confirm there will be no such EGM (as far as the board is 
> concerned)? 
> 
> There has been no progress. :-)
> 
> Personally I would quite like some progress, and think we ought to use STV - 
> it would be great if people could get drafting resolutions.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Turvey
> -- 
> 07403 216 991
> @AndrewTurvey
> http://www.facebook.com/andrew.turvey
> http://en.wikipedia.org/User:AndrewRT
> http://englishwikipedian.blogspot.co.uk/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to