On the contrary, I really do get it: you don't think it matters what gets cancelled; and I disagree. You don't think we can deliver the planned programme; and I disagree.
-- Doug On 27 September 2012 22:41, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 27, 2012 10:29 PM, "rexx" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Well if you look at the costs of VLE, for example, there are hosting and > development costs and then the costs of writing new modules. £4.5K would > still buy quite a few new modules, just not as many as £9.5K would - and > asyou say, there's always next year. > > My understanding was that the modules were going to be volunteer written. > > >Similarly I would expect that a one-day GLAM conference would cost a > little more than half of a two-day conference. It wouldn't cover so much, > but it still would be a conference. > > Perhaps, but it will take almost as much work to organise. My argument was > that you need to free up some time, not spend less. > > > > > Nevertheless, if there are particular activities that you think we ought > not to be doing, please make a case. I can't guarantee that the Board will > agree with you, but I do promise we'll give serious consideration to all > the feedback we get from the community. > > You're really not getting it. I'm not saying there are specific things you > shouldn't be doing. I'm saying you should be doing less. It really doesn't > matter what you cancel, but it is time you showed a bit of leadership and > made some difficult decisions. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
