On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Charles Matthews <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 14 November 2012 00:00, Andreas Kolbe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > And there is. Oliver's revamp of the Contact Us pages has made a huge
> > difference, because previously, PR professionals would pass three
> > invitations to fix the article themselves before they would come to the
> OTRS
> > e-mail address.
> >
> > But there is still room for improvement. OTRS e-mails should be
> responded to
> > the same day, not up to four weeks later. Is anyone collecting data on
> how
> > quickly OTRS mails are responded to? Are those data public? If not,
> there is
> > another potential area for improvement.
>
> What WSQ said.
>
> Also, rethinking the "contact us" route is one thing, encouraging more
> people to use it early is another. The first may well be helpful, the
> second in current circumstances is not going to improve things. Some
> of your questions here are clearly for the WMF.
>
> Charles
>


For better or worse, Wikipedia is the number one Google link for pretty
much everything and everyone. With that comes a responsibility to get
things right; a responsibility we cannot live up to, given the open editing
system we've got, and the number of articles and editors we've got.

Andreas
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to