For what it's worth, my opinion (as some who has had access to a fair few
OTRS queues for a fair number of years) is that we need more OTRS
volunteers. Lots more. At the moment, Wikimedia UK has about a dozen
semi-active volunteers for its queue, and we have reasonable response times
(48 hours ish). I'm not sure how many the WMF has for the global queues,
but to answer every email within, say, 48 hours, would require (in my
opinion) at least several hundred volunteers, with several dozen being
active daily.

Wikimedia UK did run an OTRS workshop, which was useful, but it turned into
more of an OTRS planning weekend, with only a few new people trained to use
OTRS. It's a very slow way of training people - it's not just the OTRS
software, but customer service skills which are needed. Most Wikipedians
can't reliably answer emails from OTRS because they don't have the needed
levels of WIkipedia experience, OTRS system experience, and customer
service experience. There's the added (necessary) stumbling block
of identifying to the WMF.

<radicalthinking>
Perhaps OTRS access to the English Wikipedia courtesy queue could be given
to English Wikipedia admins who are willing to identify to the WMF? That
would free up the experienced OTRS agents to handle the more important
'quality' queue. </radicalthinking>

Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).

*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*



On 14 November 2012 12:53, Charles Matthews <[email protected]
> wrote:

> On 14 November 2012 12:42, Andreas Kolbe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Charles Matthews
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 14 November 2012 00:00, Andreas Kolbe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > And there is. Oliver's revamp of the Contact Us pages has made a huge
> >> > difference, because previously, PR professionals would pass three
> >> > invitations to fix the article themselves before they would come to
> the
> >> > OTRS
> >> > e-mail address.
> >> >
> >> > But there is still room for improvement. OTRS e-mails should be
> >> > responded to
> >> > the same day, not up to four weeks later. Is anyone collecting data on
> >> > how
> >> > quickly OTRS mails are responded to? Are those data public? If not,
> >> > there is
> >> > another potential area for improvement.
> >>
> >> What WSQ said.
> >>
> >> Also, rethinking the "contact us" route is one thing, encouraging more
> >> people to use it early is another. The first may well be helpful, the
> >> second in current circumstances is not going to improve things. Some
> >> of your questions here are clearly for the WMF.
> >>
> >> Charles
> >
> >
> >
> > For better or worse, Wikipedia is the number one Google link for pretty
> much
> > everything and everyone. With that comes a responsibility to get things
> > right; a responsibility we cannot live up to, given the open editing
> system
> > we've got, and the number of articles and editors we've got.
>
> The trouble is ... we have no power over Google, do we? It is a
> familiar argument that you are putting.
>
> The actual solutions are (1)  to grow the community (and I mean
> growing it with responsible, well-trained editors). I personally have
> put time and effort into this in the past, as well as editing many
> hours a day. And (2) to make it easier for the community to do useful
> work.
>
> Now the WMF is well resourced, we should really be discussing these
> matters. The traditional spiralling blame game set off by "case
> studies" is not the best way, IMX.
>
> Charles
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to