Fae, Stevie hasn't said there were "out of scope" objections, he's just
open-mindedly consulting us about whether we think it's out of scope.


On 28 November 2013 15:18, Fæ <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 28 November 2013 13:24, Stevie Benton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Wikimedia UK has been asked to consider signing a document supporting
> these
> > International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to
> > Communications Surveillance In principle I think this is worthwhile and
> > shows that we are on the side of the every day internet user. But some
> may
> > say it is out of our scope. What do people think? If there's a consensus
> > I'll add Wikimedia UK to the list.
> >
> > This can be discussed on this list or on the Water Cooler of the WMUK
> wiki
> > if you prefer.
>
> What were the "out of our scope" objections?
>
> Thanks,
> Fae
> --
> [email protected] http://j.mp/faewm
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>



-- 
Dr Martin L Poulter
Jisc Wikimedia Ambassador, July 2013 - March 2014
Wikipedia contributor         http://enwp.org/User:MartinPoulter
Volunteer, Wikimedia UK
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:MartinPoulter<http://uk.wikimedia.org/>
Musician                          http://soundcloud.com/martin-poulter
                                       http://myspace.com/comapilot
Person                             http://infobomb.org/
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to