On 1 July 2014 19:22, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1 July 2014 18:45, HJ Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree that other projects should be considered, > > as useful background if nothing else > > Quite. > > > but quibbling over details of the past isn't going to > > help the discussion move forward for the benefit > > of the *future* of these projects. > > I do not believe that reiterating my objection to past good work, by > me and others, being written out of the chapter's history is > "quibbling", much less "over details". > > Hmm, I recall an earlier thread on this list which was pretty much devoted to contention over how the history of Wikipedians in residence got written. This thread is intended to help a staff member do her job. It would be a shame, certainly, if WiRs became one of those "don't bring that up again" topics. Charles
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
