See if this helps any: https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Wikimedian_in_Residence_2014_review&diff=58516&oldid=58512
-- Rexx On 1 July 2014 20:47, Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 July 2014 19:22, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 1 July 2014 18:45, HJ Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I agree that other projects should be considered, >> > as useful background if nothing else >> >> Quite. >> >> > but quibbling over details of the past isn't going to >> > help the discussion move forward for the benefit >> > of the *future* of these projects. >> >> I do not believe that reiterating my objection to past good work, by >> me and others, being written out of the chapter's history is >> "quibbling", much less "over details". >> >> Hmm, I recall an earlier thread on this list which was pretty much > devoted to contention over how the history of Wikipedians in residence got > written. This thread is intended to help a staff member do her job. > > It would be a shame, certainly, if WiRs became one of those "don't bring > that up again" topics. > > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
