On 1 July 2014 21:57, Michael Peel <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this would be more factually accurate: > > https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Wikimedian_in_Residence_2014_review&diff=58518&oldid=58516 > > Maybe. Isn't that the point I asked about on a previous occasion?
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediauk-l/2014-April/012066.html As you said there, "Some of the history's never been recorded." So, editing it into a report? You may well think this is more factually accurate, and who knows, you may be right. Does seem to be fighting the battles of a previous war, though, with a source of iffy reliability. Not quite sure who this "proxy war" is against. Frankly, there are reporting requirements on chapters, and so significant matters should be documented. Charles
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
