Indeed, that would be a good start as a pilot project. Does anyone from WMUK have contacts with the Parliament?
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko) On 8 July 2016 at 07:18, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > On 08 July 2016 at 01:51 とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > It can be argued that the current copyright obfuscates the general > public's access to the report. I feel it is in the public's best interest > to have this monolith of documentation on a more user friendly venue such > as Wikisource where it can be more manageable and digestible. > > While I'm in sympathy with the aim (I even have the Scott Report on my > shelves, which is not "digested") my immediate thought is that the > Executive Summary should be used as a pilot project, if anything is > actually to happen. > > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
