Also! Just to introduce myself, I'm one of the interns with the Program Evaluation & Design team - thus this upgrade is very timely. Thank you!
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Edward Galvez <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks for this! Just did a cohort of 15K and it worked fine. I > unintentionally hit the "back" button, but after clicking "forward" and my > cohort was validated, not even 10 seconds later. > > Also, I can't seem to find the place that listed which users were not > valid. Did we lose that ability? > > - E > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dan Andreescu > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dario Taraborelli < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> fantastic, is there any chance we could get an even better performance >>> if we allowed users to specify the field type in the upload form (if it’s >>> just user_ids, validation will be faster and the app doesn’t need to check >>> every single entry for a valid user_name too). I understand that by design >>> the application makes no assumption about the type of that field (and in >>> fact it accepts a mix of user_id’s and user_names, correct)? >>> >> >> absolutely, it would run up to 2x faster if the file was all user_ids and >> the user specified that up front. But currently, yes, you can mix user_ids >> and user_names >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimetrics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Wikimetrics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
