Yes, we need user names and I can imagine some cases for potential mixed cohorts, but not sure about prevalence - Jaime
On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]> wrote: > I (and by extension other people in the research team) will probably only > ever use user_ids (which we know in advance are valid), so it’s probably best > to ask Program Evauation folks or community members who may rely on usernames. > > On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Edward. Yes, we temporarily lost the UI that shows what users are >> invalid. I wasn't sure what exactly people needed here so I didn't hazard a >> guess. The data is all there though and I can easily show you invalid >> users and invalid reasons for your cohort. >> >> I just maybe need you and someone else to say how you'd like it to work and >> I can whip up a view for it tomorrow. Dario, any opinion on how invalid >> users should be displayed? The only weird part now is that you can't upload >> again. You'd have to delete the whole cohort and start over... >> — >> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Edward Galvez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Also! Just to introduce myself, I'm one of the interns with the Program >>> Evaluation & Design team - thus this upgrade is very timely. Thank you! >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Edward Galvez <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Thanks for this! Just did a cohort of 15K and it worked fine. I >>>> unintentionally hit the "back" button, but after clicking "forward" and my >>>> cohort was validated, not even 10 seconds later. >>>> >>>> Also, I can't seem to find the place that listed which users were not >>>> valid. Did we lose that ability? >>>> >>>> - E >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dario Taraborelli >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> fantastic, is there any chance we could get an even better performance >>>>>> if we allowed users to specify the field type in the upload form (if >>>>>> it’s just user_ids, validation will be faster and the app doesn’t need >>>>>> to check every single entry for a valid user_name too). I understand >>>>>> that by design the application makes no assumption about the type of >>>>>> that field (and in fact it accepts a mix of user_id’s and user_names, >>>>>> correct)? >>>>> >>>>> absolutely, it would run up to 2x faster if the file was all user_ids and >>>>> the user specified that up front. But currently, yes, you can mix >>>>> user_ids and user_names >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wikimetrics mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimetrics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimetrics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
_______________________________________________ Wikimetrics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
